22 September 2008
OBAMA (On the Illinois Senate floor): Number one, whenever we define a previable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we're really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a -- a child, a nine-month-old -- child that was delivered to term. That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place. I mean, it -- it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute.
Previous Posts
- A propos
- Remarkable book
- Interesting reflection
- The world would be a happier place if (#3):
- So...whatcha up to?
- Yikes: more meaningless sententiousness!
- Another pointless point
- I wish I were a jellyfish
- Note
- Oh man...

- ^Hey, annually super (but never superannuated), it's the patriarch!^

- ^St. Bruno^

- ^More St. Bruno!^

- ^Gundula Janowitz^
- ^Penultimate, but not penumbral: The Nephew^
- ^Last and least, but not least: The Godson^
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home